From dmulholl@cs.indiana.edu Tue Jan 24 11:26:18 1995
Received: from moose.cs.indiana.edu by whale.cs.indiana.edu
	(5.65c/9.4jsm) id AA21608; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 11:26:17 -0500
Received: from flute.cs.indiana.edu by moose.cs.indiana.edu
	(5.65c/9.4jsm) id AA04703; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 11:26:15 -0500
Received: by flute.cs.indiana.edu
	(5.65c/9.4jsm) id AA05627; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 11:26:11 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 11:26:11 -0500
From: "Daniel Yaqob" <dmulholl@cs.indiana.edu>
To: abassa@sugar.neosoft.com, dmulholl@cs.indiana.edu, fisseha@cig.mot.com,
        ybf2u@curry.edschool.virginia.edu
Subject: Re:  Unicode (this time for sure)
Status: R


Gentlemen,

  The outline in the first posting looks like a good starting point.
Allow me please to communicate from this account which has less traffic
then yacob@apollo -and less chance for me to miss a letter.  It is
fine by me to use the Web access I have here to facilitate graphical
communication for our discussion.  I do not think security would become
a problem.  Would it be  a good idea to keep our postings archived
for people who come into the discussion later (archived on web).

  On that point, I would suggest to include other members of the 
software community in these discussions, I know of a few with email
accounts.  Critical to its implementation will be the question of the
vendor "Can I use it?"  I have seen some software packages that would
have had to limit what they offered if working with the first
proposal.  Hence the value of their input during design of a table for
fidel.

  -- dan'El